New Parliament Inauguration: Opposition Boycotts, Wrestlers Detained

New Delhi: In a momentous occasion right this moment, Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled the brand new parliament constructing, marking a major milestone in India’s democratic journey. The Prime Minister, accompanied by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, arrived on the website at 7:30 am, commencing the day with a puja ceremony. Following the conclusion of the puja, Prime Minister Modi humbly prostrated earlier than the historic sceptre ‘sengol,’ a logo of energy and authority.
Picture courtesy: @narendramodi?/Twitter
In the course of the puja, the revered Adheenam seers introduced the ‘sengol’ to the Prime Minister, who sought their blessings on this auspicious event. Holding the historic sceptre in his fingers, Prime Minister Modi proceeded to the Lok Sabha chamber, the place he reverently put in it beside the Speaker’s chair, signifying the continuity of democratic traditions.
Expressing his gratitude and appreciation, the Prime Minister felicitated a gaggle of devoted development employees who contributed their expertise and efforts to convey the brand-new parliament to life. Their unwavering dedication performed an important function within the profitable completion of the mission.
Persevering with the inclusive spirit, representatives from numerous spiritual faiths performed ‘sarv-dharma’ prayers, emphasizing the unity and concord that underpins India’s numerous society. The nation’s dedication to secularism was mirrored on this collective invocation of blessings.
The unique parliament constructing, which was completed in 1927 and is now 96 years outdated, was inadequate, necessitating the development of a brand new one. With its cutting-edge facilities, the brand new parliament constructing can simply match 888 members within the Lok Sabha chamber and 300 members within the Rajya Sabha chamber. Moreover, the Lok Sabha chamber has a capability of 1,280 members for a joint session of each chambers.
The development supplies used within the new constructing have been sourced from numerous components of the nation, showcasing India’s wealthy cultural heritage. Teak wooden from Maharashtra’s Nagpur, crimson and white sandstone from Sarmathura in Rajasthan, and carpets from Mirzapur in Uttar Pradesh are just some examples. The meticulous collection of supplies ensured that the brand new parliament constructing mirrored the variety and ethos of the nation.
Picture courtesy: @narendramodi/Twitter
Constructed by Tata Tasks Ltd, the magnificent new Parliament Home incorporates a grand structure corridor that serves as a tribute to India’s democratic heritage. Moreover, it homes a well-appointed lounge for MPs, a library, a number of committee rooms, eating areas, and ample parking area, offering a conducive atmosphere for legislative proceedings and parliamentary actions.
The putting triangular-shaped four-story constructing spans a formidable built-up space of 64,500 sq. meters. Its architectural design incorporates three most important gates – Gyan Dwar, Shakti Dwar, and Karma Dwar – symbolizing information, energy, and motion, respectively. Moreover, the brand new parliament constructing has separate entrances for VIPs, MPs, and guests, guaranteeing clean entry for all stakeholders.
To commemorate this historic event, the federal government has introduced the discharge of a particular ₹75 coin, serving as a tangible memento of the disclosing of the brand new parliament home. This coin represents the collective delight and aspirations of the nation because it embarks on a brand new chapter in its democratic journey.
Opposition boycotts
The inauguration of the brand new parliament constructing by Prime Minister Narendra Modi right this moment was marred by the absence of a whole lot of opposition get together members. The occasion confronted sturdy criticism from opposition politicians, environmentalists, and civil society teams, who voiced considerations over its price, development in the course of the pandemic, and alleged lack of session with lawmakers and the general public.
This isn’t the primary time the Congress get together has stayed away from such an occasion, as they’d additionally shunned attending the inspiration stone-laying ceremony of the brand new parliament in 2020. Nevertheless, this time, a number of opposition events got here collectively to announce a boycott of the inauguration ceremony earlier within the week.
They argued that it ought to have been the nation’s president, who holds a largely ceremonial place, to inaugurate the parliament constructing, quite than Prime Minister Modi. They seen the choice as a violation of constitutional ideas and parliamentary procedures.
In an open letter addressed to the federal government, opposition teams labeled Prime Minister Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Celebration (BJP) authorities as “authoritarian” and criticized his resolution to inaugurate the parliament constructing, sidelining President Murmu.
The letter described this act as a grave insult and a direct assault on India’s democracy. It stated, “We discover no worth in a brand new constructing when the soul of democracy has been sucked out of Parliament.”
The absence of opposition members on the inauguration ceremony served as a visual show of their protest in opposition to what they perceived as undemocratic actions by the ruling authorities. Their resolution to boycott the occasion highlights their considerations concerning the erosion of democratic norms and ideas.
The opposition’s criticism primarily revolved across the perceived lack of transparency and inclusivity within the decision-making course of concerning the brand new parliament constructing. They raised objections to the development mission’s price, notably in the course of the ongoing pandemic when the federal government’s focus ought to be on addressing pressing public well being and socio-economic challenges.
Moreover, allegations have been made that the federal government had did not seek the advice of lawmakers and the broader public, thereby diminishing the legitimacy of the mission.
Wrestlers detained
The grand inauguration of India’s new parliament constructing took an sudden flip right this moment when a gaggle of distinguished wrestlers, together with Olympic medallists, tried to stage a protest earlier than the newly unveiled construction. Whereas the ceremony proceeded inside, the wrestlers have been detained by the Delhi Police, who prevented them from finishing up their demonstration.
Picture Courtesy: Twitter
The wrestlers, led by Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and Bajrang Punia, have been actively protesting in Delhi, demanding the resignation and arrest of Brij Bhushan Singh, the president of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI). Mr. Singh, an influential lawmaker, and politician related to the Bharatiya Janata Celebration (BJP), is going through severe allegations of sexual abuse and harassment from feminine wrestlers. Nevertheless, he firmly denies these allegations.
The detained wrestlers had deliberate to march to the brand new parliament constructing, the place they supposed to stage their protest in opposition to Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and convey consideration to their calls for. Sadly, the Delhi Police intervened and prevented them from reaching their supposed vacation spot. Moreover, the makeshift tents arrange by the protesting wrestlers at Jantar Mantar, a standard website for protests in Delhi, have been additionally eliminated by the police.
The presence of distinguished athletes and Olympic medallists within the wrestling group has introduced important consideration to the allegations in opposition to the WFI president. The wrestlers have been elevating their voices to hunt justice and accountability inside their sporting federation.
The Delhi Police’s detaining of the protesting wrestlers highlights the stress surrounding the difficulty. Whereas the inauguration of the brand new parliament constructing was meant to be a momentous event, the wrestlers’ protest serves as a reminder of the continued challenges confronted by the sporting group and the demand for accountability in instances of alleged misconduct.